KnowYourCOURTS.com

Public Access to Colorado Court Records



Sidebar: Family Court Censorship & Secrecy

 

According to one exposé on censorship by Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D., "Many people have trouble believing harrowing tales of human rights abuses now taking place in American family courts and wonder why, if they are true, we do not hear more about it. Perhaps because in many jurisdictions it is a crime to criticize family court judges or otherwise discuss family law cases publicly. In other words, censorship works."  Baskerville alleges the following:

  • In March of 2006, Kevin Thompson received an order prohibiting distribution of his book, Exposing the Corruption in the Massachusetts Family Courts.   >> Fox News coverage >>  The judge also impounded the records of Thompson's custody case, reinforcing the secrecy in which family courts (including those in Colorado) often operate.



  • Phillip Dean was jailed for placing signs and placards in his yard, which criticized an Alabama divorce judge and stated, "Our Courts are a Joke."  The incensed judge's order stated, in pertinent part, ". . . the Court finding that the signs are of such a disparaging nature as to constitute direct contempt of court, it is ORDERED that the Sheriff of Jackson County arrest the defendant . . . Following his arrest, the defendant shall not be entitled to bond." >> Associated Press report >>   >> Huntsville Times report >>



  • Alice Tulanowksi of New Brunswick, New Jersey, was placed under a gag rule in 2000, though judges and the New Jersey Chapter of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts were left "free to discuss the intimate details of Alice's case" in public.



  • Stanley Rains of Victoria, Texas, in 2001 was gagged "from speaking, writing, or publishing his opinions" about why he was cut off from his daughter for more than two years, according to court documents. The order covers private conversations and discussions with mental health professionals and his minister. Issued with no evidentiary hearing, the order followed an article Rains published in Fathering Magazine. He was also prohibited from criticizing a city council candidate who was a divorce lawyer. The order precluded Rains from photographing death threats written on his mother's car.



  • The former husband of singer Wynonna Judd was arrested and jailed for talking to reporters about his divorce.



  • A California judge shut down the Web site of "The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Attorneys and Judges" in 2001. >> full article text >>  (An archived copy of the site is available here). David Palmer was later exonerated of charges that the Web site constituted the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). >> full article text >>



  • In 2005, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott formally asked a federal court to punish Charles Edward Lincoln, for criticizing the state's family courts. Abbott termed the criticism, which consisted in filing some court papers, "bloodless terrorism."

Here in Colorado, KnowYourCOURTS.com has received reports from several parties alleging that judges have either retaliated for talking about the divorce case or the judge or have been ordered to take down a Web site:

  • One contributor, who has asked us to maintain his anonymity because of his pending custody case, informed us that he was threatened or intimidated by a family judge in relation to his Web sites, http://bigdogtk.blogspot.com  and www.edbudd.150m.com.

  • Another contributor, who also asked us not to reveal her name out of fear of judicial retaliation, sent us an email, where she alleged that Judge Roxanne Bailin had ordered her to remove her Web site (http://infaithsname.com), which was critical of the judge and CFI Bill J. Fyfe.  She also alleged that Bill J. Fyfe suggested or initiated that the Boulder case be sealed, so that no one would learn what had transpired in that case.

Resources

CoCourts.com

CoCourts.com  In 2000, Colorado became one of the first states in the country to allow public access to its court's information database. A contract was awarded to Boulder-based e-InfoData.com, Inc to create a public-access web site interface to the data in the Colorado Judicial Branch's Integrated Colorado On-line Network (ICON). Access information on Colorado district and county court cases including both open and closed cases.  An individual's public court records can be accessed by submitting their last name and either the full first name or part thereof. Searches can be further narrowed by including the date of birth, and/or case number. Sealed, probate, mental health, and juvenile cases are not available.  At the time of this writing, the Web site charges $6 per search, even if the query returns null. Because KnowYourCourts.com assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of this information, please visit the site to independently ascertain pricing and services.


LexisNexis File-&-Serve

In 2000, Colorado became the first state to adopt e-filing across the state using LexisNexis File & Serve and, at the time of this writing, leads the nation in number of courts online and number of filings and service transactions. All 64 counties are online, and e-filing is used in over 80 percent of the general jurisdiction court civil cases. Many Colorado courts have already converted from voluntary to mandatory e-filing. A fully mandatory environment greatly reduces the burden on the court clerk's office by reducing the amount of scanning and providing judges with a complete electronic case record, rather than a record that is partially electronic and partially paper. A detailed Colorado e-filing case study is available at www.lexisnexis.com/ColoradoStory.  Public access services are available here.


Office of the Colorado State Court Administrator

Colorado State Court Administrator's Office (1301 Pennsylvania Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO - (303)-861-1111). Primary contact: public.access@judicial.state.co.us   Alternate contacts: Jessica Zender, Policy Analyst (jessica.zender@judicial.state.co.us); Linda Bowers, public access manager (linda.bowers@judicial.state.co.us).  This office is able to produce predefined reports out of ICON for $.75 per page and custom reports for $10 to $50 (or more, depending on the requirements and time involved).  Contact them for current pricing and service offerings.


National Center for State Courts

National Center for State Courts site, Public Access to Court Records, described as "an information clearinghouse on the topic of public access to court records and the current debate on privacy concerns that arise as courts improve and expand their court information systems and put more information on the Internet."


Colorado Open Records Request

Mike Zinna's Web site, ColoradoExposed.com, claims to be, "the authority on requesting Open Records."  His page outlines a process for filing an Open Records Request.



Articles / memoranda


February 29, 2008 - Colorado Supreme Court Chief Justice Directive 08-02 (Directive concerning assessment of cost recovery fees for maintaining the technical infrastructure necessary to support electronic access to court records)

First Judicial District General Order restricting, inter alia, all domestic relations and probate cases.

 

Feb. 19, 2008 - free access to U.S. Court Decisions

Carl Malamud latest online "public works" project, public.resource.org, is claimed to make available all Supreme Court opinions dating back to the 1700s and all U.S. appeals courts decisions dating back to 1950. Some commentators speculate that Malamud's efforts potentially represent a challenge to paid legal research services Thomson and LexisNexis. . . . Malamud's northern California-based non-profit group last week received full delivery of content from legal research company Fastcase, which agreed in November to sell the information with no strings attached. Malamud's group has spent the past several days reformatting the data to post on the Web site. "We're about getting bulk data and making it available," free of charge, to the public, Malamud told the Law Tribune last week. "I want to see all federal case law downloadable in bulk." . . . He noted that there are no restrictions on the use of the information after it's downloaded and that it's up to individuals to create Web sites that utilize the information. . . . Any initiative that "makes case law available for free in new and different ways is something all librarians are in favor of," said Darcy Kirk, associate dean for library and technology and law professor at the University of Connecticut. Read Full Story.

August 20, 2007 - A Quest to Get More Court Rulings Online, and Free (New York Times article)

July 7, 2007 - Colorado Supreme Court Issues Amended Policy on Public Access to Court Records to Reign in Rogue District Court's Censorship Policies

The Colorado Supreme Court's Public Access Committee has released an amended Chief Justice Directive 05-01, effective July 1, 2007, which rolls back much of the language that district court chief judges, like Brooke Jackson (of the First Judicial District) seized upon as authorization to engage in blanket censorship of public court records under the pretext of identify theft concerns.  KnowYourCOURTS.com has prepared a detailed line-by-line text comparison, available here.  More resources on this topic are found on our public access pages.

March 13, 2007 - Federal Court Moving Away from Secret Dockets - the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

"The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press commends as a good step forward in reducing court secrecy the U.S. Judicial Conference's vote today urging federal courts to acknowledge sealed cases in their electronic dockets. The Conference - the chief policy-making body for the federal court system - today strongly recommended all federal trial courts with electronic docketing systems clearly indicate to users that cases are sealed instead of displaying a notice reading "No such case." In announcing the change, Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., credited the Reporters Committee with uncovering the existence of the off-the-docket cases, which he said were unknown to many court officials." >>full article text>>

April 19, 2007 - Colorado court records cost-per-page set at 25¢

Colorado Confidential brings us the story that Colorado court records are no longer $1.25 per page but, rather, are set at 25¢.  This is a "big" story for KnowYourCOURTS.com staff members, who have shelled out anywhere from 75¢ a page to $1.25.  As Colorado Confidential reported in late January, Colorado for many years led the country in the highest cost per page that government agencies could charge - a practice dating back to the days when copiers were somewhat of a rarity.

April 6, 2007 - Florida High court prohibits lawsuit secrecy

The Florida Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that judges and clerks can no longer hide divorces or other civil lawsuits from the public, saying the practice threatens to ``undermine public trust in our courts.'' KnowYourCOURTS editorial comment: If the practice undermines public trust in the courts in Florida, how is it any different in Colorado? >>full article text>>  >>Fla. S.Ct. Ruling>>

In this January 02, 2006 article, Merrill Douglas explores the pros and cons of unfettered online public access to court records that formerly required a trip to the courthouse to obtain.

March, 2007 - The Seattle Times' continuing series on secrecy of court records, "Your Courts, Their Secrets," has won a National Headliner Award, was a finalist for the 2007 Goldsmith Award for Investigative Reporting and is said to be a Pulitzer finalist.

The team at the Seattle Times, through diligence and shoe-leather reporting, discovered that hundreds of court cases have been sealed in King County, Washington.  The team went to court to have these files opened with the result that misconduct by judges, medical practitioners, school principals and others was revealed.  The series has lead to the passage of reform laws by the Washington Supreme Court.

May 2006 Reference Guide to Colorado Statutes Governing Access to Court Records, prepared and distributed by the State Court Administrator's Office  (be certain to check for updates to this document)

Colorado Supreme Court Chief Justice Directive 05-01 (Directive Concerning Access to Court Records), prepared and promulgated by the Colorado Supreme Court (be certain to check for repeal or amendments to this directive)

Exemptions and other legal limitations to the Colorado Open Records Act (note: this document contains useful information, but is dated. Check the Colorado statutes and court rules often for repeal or amendments)

April 2006 Associated Press article, "Critics: Colorado Cases Need More Accessibility" (reprinted on KnowYourCOURTS.com with permission from the reporter/author)

March 12, 2006 Denver Post article, Judicial Districts Object to Public Access to Files

Nearly a year after a 2005 directive from Martinez's panel designed to protect public access, judicial districts serving 19 of Colorado's 64 counties have . . .declared files in all probate and domestic-relations matters, which are mostly divorces, off-limits to the public. >>full article text>>

April 2006 Press Release by the Reporters' Committee for Freedom of the Press: abstract: "Almost half of Colorado's 22 judicial districts have closed public access to domestic relations and probate files . . . The Reporters' Committee calls on the court to revise their orders, and respectfully notes that administrative duties -as costly as they may be- are an aspect of the courts' First Amendment obligation to accommodate the public's access to court records."

April 30, 2002 Trial Lawyers for Public Justice Comment on February 22, 2002 Draft Model Policy on Public Access to Court Records, incorporating authorities.

July 2003 article, "Are public court records too public in cyberspace?" Abstract: "Karen Salez, a spokeswoman for the Colorado Judicial Department, said that state's court system is laying off staff, so putting court records online is a low priority."

 


 

Citizen inquiries regarding public Access to court records

inquiry

response

7-11-2006 memorandum to Colorado Solicitor General

7-27-2006 memorandum from Colorado Solicitor General

6-30-2006 memorandum to Justice Alex Martinez

No Response

6-28-2006 memorandum to Gov. Owens

No Response

6-28-2006 memorandum to First Judicial District Chief Judge R. Brooke Jackson

7-15-2005 response from First Judicial District Chief Judge R. Brooke Jackson

 


 

** If you have information, corrections or updates regarding public access to court records in Colorado, please contact us: tipline@knowYourCourts.com

last updated: 07/22/2008

tipline@KnowYourCOURTS.com